<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://elgg.jiscemerge.org.uk/demerge/weblog/rss/rssstyles.xsl"?>
<rss version='2.0'   xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
    <channel xml:base='http://elgg.jiscemerge.org.uk/demerge/weblog/'>
        <title><![CDATA[The Uncommunity : Weblog]]></title>
        <description><![CDATA[The weblog for The Uncommunity, hosted on Emerge.]]></description>
        <generator>Elgg</generator>
        <link>http://elgg.jiscemerge.org.uk/demerge/weblog/</link>        
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Can someone explain Second Life to me?]]></title>
            <link>http://elgg.jiscemerge.org.uk/demerge/weblog/497.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://elgg.jiscemerge.org.uk/demerge/weblog/497.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:37:44 GMT</pubDate>
		<dc:subject><![CDATA[computer games]]></dc:subject>
		<dc:subject><![CDATA[geekery]]></dc:subject>
		<dc:subject><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></dc:subject>
		<dc:subject><![CDATA[second life]]></dc:subject>
            <description><![CDATA[<p> I&#39;m usually branded geeky. I have a Flickr account, a del.icio.us account, a Facebook account, and various other odd bits of social software that I use reasonably frequently. I do my best to maintain a couple of blogs. I can program tolerably well in several languages. I can write HTML and CSS. I contribute to a couple of open source projects. In other words, I&#39;m no slouch when it comes to this IT lark. </p><p> I have never got into playing computer games. There&#39;s lots of reasons for this - but one of the main ones is that I can&#39;t be bothered learning how to play a game. The reward/effort ratio isn&#39;t high enough to motivate me. I find exactly the same thing with Second Life. Why bother? In fact, I find Second Life even worse. Why bother in particular as the effort I expended would get me spending more time in nirvana for narcissists. </p><p> My lack of interest in these sorts of things clouds my judgement about how useful they might be pedagogically. Students have no problem immersing themselves in games. So, if there are any SLers out there... what&#39;s the point? </p>]]></description>
        </item>
                
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[What do you make of Elluminate?]]></title>
            <link>http://elgg.jiscemerge.org.uk/demerge/weblog/457.html</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://elgg.jiscemerge.org.uk/demerge/weblog/457.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:25:35 GMT</pubDate>
		<dc:subject><![CDATA[free software]]></dc:subject>
		<dc:subject><![CDATA[im]]></dc:subject>
		<dc:subject><![CDATA[jabber]]></dc:subject>
		<dc:subject><![CDATA[xmpp]]></dc:subject>
		<dc:subject><![CDATA[voip]]></dc:subject>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not a great fan of VoIP in busy offices or public places. Call me a throwback to the last century, but I feel a little uncomfortable shouting at a computer screen with a crowd of onlookers. Come to think of it, I don&#39;t like telephone conferences, either.</p><p>We&#39;ve had the odd video iChat with a guest lecturer here at Ravensbourne - it&#39;s high risk, as the video doesn&#39;t always work (good old firewall traversal). But when it does all work, it works well, and is good, exhilirating fun.</p><p>I&#39;m almost arguing against my point...</p><p>I prefer plain old text chat for synchronous communication. I have accounts with various IM networks - one can&#39;t seem to go through life these days without picking these things up - but I find <a href="http://www.jabber.org/">XMPP</a> (Jabber) the best for textual collaboration. XMPP has a &quot;group chat&quot; or &quot;conference&quot; facility (often known under the TLA of &quot;MUC&quot; - multi-user chat). This can work across Jabber federations. For example, you can join a group chat with me on our institutional Jabber server with your <a href="http://www.google.com/talk/">Google Talk</a> account - no need to have an institutional account (assuming I authorise you as a contact). </p><p>On a Mac, iChat comes with buillt-in Jabber support - or you can use the multiprotocol messaging client <a href="http://www.adiumx.com/">Adium</a>. Adium built on the free software &quot;libpurple&quot; library that is the core of <a href="http://www.pidgin.im/">Pidgin IM</a> (formerly Gaim). There&#39;s a version of Pidgin for Linux and Windows. Pidgin and Adium have straightforward support for Jabber group chat.</p><p>For a bit more than just chatting, try <a href="http://thecoccinella.org/">the Coccinella</a> - a Jabber client with a shared whiteboard capability, and first class conference room management tools. (The Coccinella has Jingle support so, under the right circumstances, it&#39;s capable of voice chat, too).</p><p>It&#39;s interesting how instant messaging is becoming almost a command-line for the 21st century. I keep Adium running all the time, so I&#39;m generally reachable for a chat. Clever developers have leveraged this by providing chat interfaces to other services. <a href="http://twitter.com/">Twitterers</a> know they can send their tweets via their IM client. There&#39;s also a service called <a href="http://imified.com/">IMified</a>, which has a range of widgets for interacting with other services like blogs, calendars, and online todo-lists. I could access an awful lot of services armed with an IM-enabled mobile phone and an IMified account. IMified has an open API, so developers can create their own widgets. </p><p>Anyway - I wonder are edu-chat clients like Elluminate the way to go, or do clients like the Coccinella and Adium (free software, both), and chat-based service providers like IMified offer more interesting possibilities?<br /> </p>]]></description>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>